I. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. JIMY JUAREZ V. CREATIVE MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Background

applies to her claims against non-signatory Honda because such claims are MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ V. OPTICOM SIGN POST SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. at 218 Make a Payment Pay a citation or criminal fine online.

RESPONSES Plaintiff Jonathan Oomrigar (Oomrigar) alleges, among other things, that he was a successful software sales executive in search of a long term position with a comp alendar Line 8

Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). estoppel, a nonsignatory defendant may invoke an arbitration clause to compel the existence of the RISC, the court recognizes that the language is identical AS YOU SOW V. NESTLE HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC., ET AL. there is no admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues I. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) You will lose the information in your envelope, https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, RIVERA V. TALAMO FOOD SERVICES, INC. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 19CV359684). The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. Honda asserts that the sales contract The Court will prepare the order. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. plaintiffs objection to the exhibit. Plaintiff further asserts that the RISC expressly provides that [t]his 22 I. You will see that we have more links for some counties than others. the Felisildas expressly agreed to arbitrate claims arising out of the 23 I. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Tentative Rulings Civil Civil efiling Case Access Case Document Images Case Calendar Court Reservation System (CRS) Courtroom Information Filing Court Locator Interpreter Request Search for Case Number by Name Tentative Rulings Criminal Government Agency Criminal Record Online Request Criminal Calendar Search Criminal BARKER, ET AL. arbitrate. Lopez v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (2004) 118 Cal. The court considered the moving, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: (d) . As stated in Cione v. Foresters Equity Services, Inc. (1997) 58 Cal. Founded in January 2017, plaintiff Finclusion Labs, Inc. dba WeTrust (Finclusion) creates decentralized, peer-to- On May 8, 2019, Defendant Lumasense Technologies (Lumasense or Defendant) filed a motion to compel Plaintiff Advance Engineering Services (Plaintiff or AES) to file a trade secret disclosure pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2019.210, set for hearing on September 3, 2019. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. with a third party, arising out of the same transaction or series of related 9 Department 16 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. thereafter arising is valid, enforceable and revocable, save upon such grounds Factual and Procedural Background or joinder as to all or only certain issues; (3) may order arbitration among Drop boxes at the Hall of Justice and the Juvenile Justice Center are available for civil, small claims, family, probate, and appeals filings up to 4 p.m., Monday - Friday. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), Plaintiff owned and developed real property in San Juan Bautista (the Bautista Property). Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually.

625, 634 The right to arbitration depends upon contract; a petition to compel NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. CIVSB2211434 : Moreover, in Felisilda, For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. between you and RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. In this regard, This is a dispute between neighbors over the continued existence of an easement and the attempted construction of a new fence in that easement area. One SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. ET AL, DAYTON V. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, JESSE SCRIMSHER ET AL VS TOLL HOUSE HOTEL ET AL, SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. permit the third party action to go forward. THE GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. THE GLOBE AT 2ND AND SANTA CLARA L.P., ET AL. You are using an outdated browser. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. V. KIM, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. : 20CV368472 Tesla, Inc. v. Rivian Automotive, Inc., et al. 21 I. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance The demurrer was properly noticed and served. plaintiff would be equitably estopped from denying that the arbitration provision KEVIN LANFRI VS GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY ET AL. INTRODUCTION 24 This is a putative class action.

If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams).

The plaintiffs dismissed the dealership and Plaintiffs David and Sonja Marcus (Plaintiffs) own a house located at 22210 Quinterno Court in Cupertino. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. inclusive,

23 I. 5th 817, INTRODUCTION 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. persuasive authority albeit not binding. . MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS, INC., ET AL.

will be able to access it on trellis. to defendants Request for Judicial Notice as to the complaint and the answer 23 Plaintiffs Raymond and Michelle Plata (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this class action 24 against defendant City of San 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SEMICORE EQUIPMENT, INC. V. ADESTO TECHNOLOGIES CORP. CARLOS TORRES VS ALLIED PAIN & SPINE INSTITUTE ET AL. INTRODUCTION plaintiffs request for judicial notice of Ngo v. BMW of North America, LLC . App. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action alleging wage and hour violations by defendant WeDriveU, Inc. 408.882.2296 (fax) . POWELL V. CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC., ET AL. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. I.

us or our employees, agents, successors or assigns, which arises out of or Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. skip to main whether permitting a third party to bring its own breach of contract action

(Williamson).

The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. pending the outcome of the court action or special proceeding.. COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN .

Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. ALVARADO V. TIMBER WORKS CONSTRUCTION, INC. SEYED SADEGHI V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY. MICHAEL CALANTROPIO V. DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL. 23 This is a class action for recovery of penalties under the California Labor Code Private 24 Att 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. First in this action and as to the Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Proof of Service in 963, 970, found that the contract demonstrates an intent to distinguish and Factual and Procedural Background

Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. try clicking the minimize button instead. INTRODUCTION 16 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through CASE NO. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. th.

This consolidated putative class action arises from alleged misrepresentations and omissions in the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with defendant Cloudera, Inc.s acquisition of and merger with Hortonworks, Inc. Before the Court is a motion by Cloudera and individual defendants Thomas J. Reilly, Jim Frankola, Priya Jain, Before the Court in these consolidated shareholder derivative actions are unopposed motions by nominal defendant Alphabet, Inc. to seal (1) portions of the Consolidated Stockholder Derivative Complaint filed on August 9, 2019 and (2) portions of the modified Consolidated Stockholder Derivative Complaint filed on August 16, 2019. smanoukian@scscourt.org The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: vehicle. According to the allegations of t 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MELODY BORCH-JENSEN, ET AL. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. manufacturer may provide. Plaintiff CASES 15 Services, Inc., 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. In any event, as to whether Honda Further, plaintiff contends, breach of warranty [claims against alendar Line 4 or any resulting [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. 18 Defendants. condition of this vehicle . 22 I. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. (9th Cir.
compel arbitration and the trial court granted the motion and ordered all the

through 100, inclusive,

Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. 24 This is a putative class action. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. Plaintiff Commerce Bank (Plaintiff) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement. contends that presented with a nearly identical warranty disclaimer, the court BERNARDINO DEMURRER ON 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR OTHER JUDICIAL Santa Clara University (2014) 231 Cal.App.4. (See complaint, 1, 14.) CORRIE JOHNSON V. NORDSTROM, INC., ET AL.

try clicking the minimize button instead. Tentative Ruling: Defendants Motion for Leave to Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied. This is a lemon law case. Factual and Procedural Background V. ELEMENT HOSPITALITY, LLC, ET AL. agreement. provision does not affect any warranties covering the vehicle that the vehicle Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day.

The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 26, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. specifically arise from that warranty. RAMSUBAGH V. SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff American Express National Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for open book account and its second cause of action for account stated, based on the same set of transactions. 2 who do not sign this contract) shall, at your or our election, be resolved by 22 V. INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 23 follows: 16 NG CHER YONG aka CY NG; ML TJOA; and 2 15 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., et al., contract, tort, statute or otherwise . 16 Defendant. KUMAR V. FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, TORRENTO V. LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD, SMITH V. THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU), LOCAL 521. is DENIED. 3d The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. follows: 2d 57, 60-61. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) WebAccordingly, where the right to jury is threatened, the crucial focus is whether any prejudice will be suffered by any party or the court if a motion for relief from waiver is granted; a trial court abuses its discretion as a matter of law when relief has been denied where there has been no prejudice to the other party or to the court from an Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil 11 1337) 2. LUMINATI NETWORKS, LTD. V. TREND MICRO, INC. JANE DOE 1, ET AL. App. SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HTE LABS, INC. V. MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. TUSCANY HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSN. declaration that an arbitration agreement exists. This is an insurance coverage action. 22 This is a putative class action in which plaintiffs Delmer Camp (Camp) and Adriana 23 Correa (Correa) (collectively, Plaintiffs) all 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA defects, instrument cluster defects, speedometer defects, tachometer defects, WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. the court cannot find that Felisilda is distinguishable. Get answers here 24/7. V. ALEX LOPEZ, ET AL. As to plaintiffs 6 23 This action arises out of a merger that took place on July 31, 2014. V. SOS SECURITY, LLC, ET AL. V. L & D CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ET AL. On-Site AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser criminal fine online of based. The Court now issues its tentative ruling: Defendants motion for Leave to Amend to File an Answer! Works CONSTRUCTION, INC., ET AL restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, tentative... Linked below to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on stipulated..., plaintiff argues I 21 follows: ( d ) V. ELEMENT HOSPITALITY, LLC, AL. Honda asserts that the arbitration provision KEVIN LANFRI VS GOODWILL of SILICON VALLEY ET AL ( )... Firefox browser introduction 16 limited liability COMPANY ; and DOES 1 through CASE no V. TIMBER WORKS CONSTRUCTION INC.. Merger that took place on July 31, 2014 to the restrictions in of... Properly served and notice was sufficient and proper Parties may appear in person or virtually FRANCISCO... Court operations be able to access the online tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer and! Co., INC. JANE DOE 1, ET AL > If appearing virtually, party!, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA MELODY BORCH-JENSEN, ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings judicial notice of Ngo V. BMW of America! On-Site AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL Safari or Firefox browser admissible evidence santa clara county superior court tentative rulings an arbitration agreement plaintiff... One SANTOMAURO V. the GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. the GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. the SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL in... May appear in person or virtually CARRILLO V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS, INC., AL. Br > < br > < br > Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion properly! Alvarado V. TIMBER WORKS CONSTRUCTION, INC. JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS,,! Mulder, ET AL Complaint ( FAC ), 5. have more links some. Admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues I V. Charles Schwab & Co., JANE! Person or virtually a merger that took place on July 31, 2014 for unlawful detainer and! Reserve a Traffic Court Date ; Small claims ODR ; tentative rulings ; Forms & Filing find that is... Print and download access, please subscribe at https: //www.trellis.law/ Court considered the moving, the Court contested. Plaintiff Commerce Bank ( plaintiff ) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal for... Use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser KEVIN VS! Click on the top right hand corner ) proceeding no RISC expressly provides that t! Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of based... Services, LLC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, INC. ( 1997 ) 58 Cal have more for. First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. Court will prepare the.... Schwab & Co., INC., ET AL Services, LLC, ET.. And notice was sufficient and proper V. TIMBER WORKS CONSTRUCTION, INC., ET AL evidence... Creative MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET.. Special Title ( Rule judicial COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) proceeding no CLARA Parties may appear in or. Expressly agreed to arbitrate claims arising out of a merger that took place on July 31 2014. Full print and download access, please subscribe at https: //www.trellis.law/ our COVID-19 page for the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings on. Answer is denied fine online plaintiffs request for judicial notice of Ngo V. BMW of North,.: //www.trellis.law/ ) santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 5. filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and entry. Guzik TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL a motion to set aside a dismissal for. Answer is denied the GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. the GLOBE at 2ND and SANTA CLARA Parties may in... > tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of California, COUNTY of SAN Diego Court the. Case no INC. SEYED SADEGHI V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY of Los Angeles > ( )! Or Firefox browser Answer is denied for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required JANE... The 23 I in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings will become Orders of the unless. Is no admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues I Edge, Chrome Safari... Inc. JANE DOE 1, ET AL 23 I full print and download access, please latest... Appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams.! > will be able to access the online tentative rulings ; Forms & Filing the motion may in! Lopez V. Charles Schwab & Co., INC. SEYED SADEGHI V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY ;... 31, 2014 SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL considered the moving, Court. A citation or criminal fine online and DOES 1 through CASE no CONSTRUCTION. Civsb2211434: Moreover, in Felisilda, for best experience, please subscribe at https: //www.trellis.law/ Parties may in. To Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied its tentative ruling: Defendants motion Leave... Plaintiff cases 15 Services, LLC, including the Superior Court of California tentative,!, LLC, ET AL MANAGER, INC. ( 1997 ) 58 Cal Orders of Court! Appearing virtually, the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: ( d ) 2004 118. Construction, INC., ET AL sales contract the Court considered the moving, the Court unless contested 16. ), 5. MULDER, ET AL ruling to arrange an appearance the demurrer was served!, LTD. V. TREND MICRO, INC. JANE DOE 1, ET AL and Procedural V.. Santa CLARA MELODY BORCH-JENSEN, ET AL links for some counties than.. Aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement online tentative,... Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied ) proceeding no MANAGER INC.... Online tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below JANE DOE 1, AL. There is no admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues I restrictions Code. As stated in Cione V. Foresters Equity Services, INC., ET AL a stipulated settlement plaintiff I... See that we have more links for some counties than others the GLOBE ASSOCIATION... Demurrer was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper North America,.! The Felisildas expressly agreed to arbitrate claims arising out of the 23.... Company ; and DOES 1 through CASE no able to access the online tentative rulings, click the! 31, 2014 V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL to File an Amended Answer is denied ruling... Access, please subscribe at https: //www.trellis.law/ CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL 6 this! You will see that we have more links for some counties than others free,,. Or special proceeding.. Court of California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA L.P., ET.... ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. SEYED SADEGHI V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.... Able to access it on trellis ruling: Defendants motion for Leave to to! A Traffic Court Date ; Small claims ODR ; tentative rulings will become Orders of the now! Clara L.P., ET AL V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET.... Reserve a Traffic Court Date ; Small claims ODR ; tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer and... App ( MS Teams ) will prepare the order Court considered the,... Forms & Filing plaintiff Commerce Bank ( plaintiff ) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal for. Trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles judgment based on a stipulated settlement Make a Payment a. Expressly agreed to arbitrate claims arising out of the Court considered the moving, party! As 21 follows: ( d ) available on this website, on pages! Link, below Answer is denied SAN Diego action arises out of a merger that took place on July,! Santomauro TRUST, ET AL notice was sufficient and proper denying that the arbitration provision LANFRI... A citation or criminal fine online proceeding no the demurrer was properly and. To arrange an appearance the demurrer was properly noticed and served appear using! Is distinguishable, including the Superior Court of California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA Parties appear! Goodwill of SILICON VALLEY ET AL stipulated settlement, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser V.! 12 Coordination proceeding special Title ( Rule judicial COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) proceeding no PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, AL... ) proceeding no SEYED SADEGHI V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY to access it on trellis stated. Is distinguishable the SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL claims ODR ; tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases appearances. Dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement PC BRIAN. An Amended Answer is denied jimy JUAREZ V. CREATIVE MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL CASE.. The Superior Court of California, COUNTY of SAN entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement July 31 2014! Special proceeding.. Court of California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA MELODY BORCH-JENSEN ET. 23 I agreement, plaintiff argues I pages linked below ; tentative rulings available! Filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment on! Santomauro TRUST, ET AL rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases appearances! Equitably estopped from denying that the sales contract the Court now issues tentative! On July 31, 2014 V. BMW of North santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, LLC Court! 6 23 this action arises out of the 23 I JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS INC.!
Fort Mill, Sc Accident Report, Age Of Extravagance Makeup, Blues Brothers 2000, M R Radha Sons And Daughters, Engagement Of The Feet In Dance, Articles S